Design decisions

PRPL is built for longevity, a concept not a lot of open source projects have as an explicit goal.

The idea is if you're building a website that will be around for 5 or 10 years, PRPL should make a compelling enough case to be a natural fit for the job.

This page outlines some thinking around the design decisions made in pursuit of that target.

Source-output alignment

A major frustration in the JavaScript community is the complexity added to projects from tooling like frameworks, bundlers and compilers. One result of this trend is that source code no longer looks anything like the output that the browser consumes.

As the gap between source and output widens, the greater the context shift is between writing source code and inspecting the DOM during development. The further we get in our thinking from how the browser sees our code, the more layers of abstraction there are to manage.

PRPL aims to reduce the discrepancy between source code and output. This offers many benefits:

One-sitting source code

Many popular open source projects have a codebase that can take days or weeks to understand. PRPL seeks to avoid this by keeping the overall scope small, and making sure all code is fully typed and explicitly commented.

If you can understand PRPL's source code in one sitting (a few hours), you can more easily:

Functions, not configuration

PRPL sidesteps the concept of a configuration file entirely, preferring to pass any optional parameters directly into each exported function instead. This constraint forces:

Web APIs, not framework APIs

Wherever possible, PRPL leverages native web platform APIs over custom framework APIs. This is the ultimate move to support the goal of longevity: if the W3C and friends agree on a specification and the major browsers implement it, there is very little chance of that API going away.

By betting on web APIs, you:

See platform APIs next.